Recent content by RonnieT

Nice Roadrunner. If you're actually interested in purchasing, send me a private msg with your cell and we can discuss. Those plates are the originals, not the location of the car. Speaking of location, please identify vs current description "on land".

Thanks for clarification. So, absence of N97 correctly reflects the 318 engine was not subject to the Hemi/440-6 noise package requirement. I see others are adding confirming Agreement check mark.

Thanks Terry and that's a great story. Most importantly - thank you for your service to this great country.

And here's the 69 Charger R/T SE prepped for sale...of course I had dozens more pics of both Challenger and Charger but not going to bog down systems posting them all here. Besides, they aren't my cars anymore. Just sharing b/c I know all of you love seeing any / all old mopars.

Pics of my 70 R/T prepped for sale.

Smart man and solid advice.

Agreed 100% - with emphasis on WIMPY!

Hi Deathproof - well...compared to the guys in this forum, I'm clearly falling short. I never considered myself an expert. I was fairly well informed 20 years ago when I bought it, but I collected my favorites from all 3 major mfg (Ford, Chrysler and Chevrolet) and I was relatively well informed...

Rear Differential...

Rear Leaf Springs / Frame Rails / Shocks

More Front Suspension

Front Suspension

More Trunks...

Thanks moparleo and everyone else for all the helpful feedback. Thx JD for all the help and I'll look again for that Engine Block VIN stamp - I was looking on the correct side of the block, but up too high (where head meets block / behind water pump housing). I do have a ton of pics guys -...

I was able to get good pics of the Block Casting Date, which reads 10*22*69. That date corresponds correctly with the Manufacture Date of 12-1969 (Door Tag), as well as the Sales Date of 12-30-1969 (Sales Invoice). I've read that VIN stamp on 318 Barracuda block pad was inconsistent and often...