• Welcome to For E Bodies Only !

    We are a community of Plymouth Cuda and Dodge Challenger owners. Join now! Its Free!

Recent content by Dean N

  1. Dean N

    340 Valve Springs

    Thanks for the offer. I saw more data posted that it is 1.100, but even if that is so, it appears Comp 901s would be lighter than my existing 30 year old springs.
  2. Dean N

    340 Valve Springs

    Dartfreak75, just a driver. I was hoping to be able to simply get the car together to enjoy a little bit, but simple seems to be unrealistic. The springs I currently have are unknown, and 901s would be lighter than my 29 year old springs. Chryco Psycho, I'll try to make some calls early next...
  3. Dean N

    340 Valve Springs

    Bind is listed at 1.100. By my math there is still 0.080 until bind, but I still don't know if it is all going to be too stiff. Extrapolating the pressure of the Lunati per thousandth of compression (which I know is only ballparking it) is ~0.364 PSI 0.001. Squeezing down on it 0.113 more than...
  4. Dean N

    340 Valve Springs

    I looked at Crane 99839, but was unable to find more complete specifications. Couldn't find a listing of Engle springs. Crower, after looking through pages and pages of springs, mostly doubles and others that wouldn't work, so I gave up. I also looked at PAS & PSI, but didn't see anything even...
  5. Dean N

    340 Valve Springs

    I looked at Lunati and the 73126 just might do, though they state an installed height of 1.8. Not sure what the result would be on mine at 1.687. I don't think that would be much of a problem, but I will try to verify. Open pressures are a bit higher, but not by much, plus I am not 100% sure of...
  6. Dean N

    340 Valve Springs

    Possibly Comp 942, but I'll need different retainers.
  7. Dean N

    340 Valve Springs

    My ("new") engine has been sitting for ~30 years, so I pulled a couple springs (singles with dampeners) and tested them, one that had been compressed all this time and one that had not. Installed height measured at ~1.687, and the uncompressed spring tested out to ~290# at 1.180 (0.507 lift). I...
  8. Dean N

    Time to get back in the game – 1972 ‘Cuda 340

    Thanks, folks!
  9. Dean N

    Front Brake Line Routing

    My apologies, but I left off a crucial element in my post. By "correct routing", I was referring to the option of the stock routing with the front lines going over the frame or under the frame. moparleo, gotcha. fasjac, what are you referring o with FSM? Some sort of service manual...
  10. Dean N

    Time to get back in the game – 1972 ‘Cuda 340

    Yep, I kinda figure it will be interesting, but there are a lot of resources available today that we/I didn't have 40 years ago, so hopefully I won't screw up too much. :)
  11. Dean N

    Time to get back in the game – 1972 ‘Cuda 340

    LOL! Sorry, no can do as long as I have my Turbo Regal. A/C, leather seats, and ~470RWHP & ~610RWTQ is something I can't turn my back on. :) It will always be faster than the 'Cuda, but it ain't a 'Cuda. Side note: DANG that engine pic posted super red! It is not that searing of a color!
  12. Dean N

    Front Brake Line Routing

    I know there have been threads in the past regarding correct routing, but does it matter if complete correctness is not the goal? Other than the obvious, what is the difference? Is there anything that mandates one path versus the other? For an entire new system, can I just pick one and go with...
  13. Dean N

    Time to get back in the game – 1972 ‘Cuda 340

    Thanks. Just don't get to close, and it looks fine. :) Dean
Back
Top