larry4406
Well-Known Member
I had to go back and look at those. WTF?Exhaust tips from a Chevy Citation 024
I had to go back and look at those. WTF?Exhaust tips from a Chevy Citation 024
I believe 1970 California built cars were not available with the dual exhaust through the valance. This could be another "dealer installed" item, but then the tips would be correct. Still a very nice car.Exhaust tips from a Chevy Citation 024
Thanks Tom - appreciate you.Whether it is a "A true factory reference" or not, it is a very nice looking vehicle!
Hi Adam and thanks for your message. I never considered that possibility because the Broadcast Sheet has entries for both left and right side exhaust. I did look into the CA legal situation in 1970 - there were no California-specific restrictions in 1970 regarding dual exhaust or valence exit tips. CA did have regs on emissions, which is why my Window Sticker shows Evaporative Emission Control (N95). That emissions feature was required for CA registration in 1970.I believe 1970 California built cars were not available with the dual exhaust through the valance. This could be another "dealer installed" item, but then the tips would be correct. Still a very nice car.
Thanks for your message DPC. I'm probably diff than many Sellers - I posted here first because I know there are many folks who have tremendous knowledge and would politely point things out if I had it wrong. I'm very appreciative of the knowledge share and will make mods to my ad copy accordingly. Thanks again.There are many things about this car that are not "factory" beyond the claimed dealer installed add ons and a BC/CC repaint.
Good luck with the sale. Looks to likely be a fairly solid and nice driver, but I think you chose the wrong forum to try and market this car as "a true factory-reference and investment-grade Barracuda.
See last bullet under Condition Highlights. It reads:No front bumper?
Thanks for your message DPC. I'm probably diff than many Sellers - I posted here first because I know there are many folks who have tremendous knowledge and would politely point things out if I had it wrong. I'm very appreciative of the knowledge share and will make mods to my ad copy accordingly. Thanks again
Thanks BR. I already shared that I utilized use of all the AI engines for research / fact checking - that's not being disguised but it's also not the exclusive source. Anyway, I acknowledge that at least the 2 of you don't concur with the production numbers. I appreciate that and hoping others will weigh in. If they aren't valid, I would like to know which figures (or all) are incorrect.The heavily formatted responses with bullets, bolding and especially the emojis is all just copy/pasted straight from ChatGPT. This is what the output of the current version of ChatGPT looks like. The ad copy and responses are mostly just AI-written, which explains the over-the-top "true factory-reference and investment-grade" description, hallucination of exact production figures which we know don't exist with that level of certainty and mixing up what transmission the car was originally delivered with. "Multiple sources" = ChatGPT.
Good luck with the sale. It looks like a solid car.
