Challenger RTA
Well-Known Member
The yellow ones are to easy to see. We like a challenge. The new ones have Grid lines.
We are good for iron site up to 300 yards. Not quite zeroed in on 300 to 1000 yards. The small rectangle one on the bottom is good for 75-100 yards with slugs. Practice makes perfect. Perfect wins every time!
From a post.
SURVEILLANCE CAMERAS ARE NOW BECOMING A TARGET. WHY?
Across the United States, a growing anti-surveillance movement is taking direct action against Flock Safety's AI-powered license plate reader cameras. The Guardian documented 33 anti-Flock incidents across 23 states, ranging from damaged cameras to protest actions aimed at disrupting the expanding surveillance network.
Flock Safety says its cameras help law enforcement investigate crimes and recover stolen vehicles. The company, valued at around $8.4 billion, operates in more than 6,000 communities and processes billions of license plate scans every month.
At the same time, critics argue the technology has expanded into mass surveillance without sufficient public oversight. According to The Guardian, more than 80 municipalities, including Austin and Denver, have ended their Flock contracts over concerns about privacy, data access, and the use of camera data in immigration enforcement. Others continue to support the technology as an important public safety tool..
As AI-powered surveillance becomes more widespread, where should society draw the line between public safety and personal privacy?
See less
My 2¢ . A camera is not going to come to someones aid in time of need. The core principle of to protect and serve, is to to come to someones aid in time of need. It is better to be proactive then reactive. Proactive: The dead can not be brought back to life. Reactive: To go find someone that committed a crime. There's always that grainy image that can't be seen! Personalty it hasn't effected me yet. I'm thinking of the fellow a US citizen and the future.
As far as the initial cost , maintenance and other. I think it would be more coast effective an officer on duty. It would be more discretionary. As IBM in the late 80's stated. "I computer can not be held accountable for a decision So there for a computer should not make a management decision." If your not up to speed about image manipulation. Think AI.
We are good for iron site up to 300 yards. Not quite zeroed in on 300 to 1000 yards. The small rectangle one on the bottom is good for 75-100 yards with slugs. Practice makes perfect. Perfect wins every time!
From a post.
Across the United States, a growing anti-surveillance movement is taking direct action against Flock Safety's AI-powered license plate reader cameras. The Guardian documented 33 anti-Flock incidents across 23 states, ranging from damaged cameras to protest actions aimed at disrupting the expanding surveillance network.
As AI-powered surveillance becomes more widespread, where should society draw the line between public safety and personal privacy?
See less
My 2¢ . A camera is not going to come to someones aid in time of need. The core principle of to protect and serve, is to to come to someones aid in time of need. It is better to be proactive then reactive. Proactive: The dead can not be brought back to life. Reactive: To go find someone that committed a crime. There's always that grainy image that can't be seen! Personalty it hasn't effected me yet. I'm thinking of the fellow a US citizen and the future.
As far as the initial cost , maintenance and other. I think it would be more coast effective an officer on duty. It would be more discretionary. As IBM in the late 80's stated. "I computer can not be held accountable for a decision So there for a computer should not make a management decision." If your not up to speed about image manipulation. Think AI.
Last edited:
