• Welcome to For E Bodies Only !

    We are a community of Plymouth Cuda and Dodge Challenger owners. Join now! Its Free!

SURVIVOR vs. GROUND-UP RESTORATION!

ECS

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
354
Reaction score
54
Here are a few detail comparisons between an Original Chrysler Battery versus a Reproduction Unit.

01.jpg


02.jpg


03.jpg


04.jpg


06.jpg
 

ECS

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
354
Reaction score
54
Thanks for getting in touch with me. You guys do great work.

Thank You! We went to great extremes to keep the Paint in spec with the Factory application. Every 6 to 8 inches of the Body was documented with a mil gauge prior to color sanding. After removing approximately 1 to 1.5 mils of original paint from the surface, we then went around the entire vehicle and put primer back in those areas that needed to be built up prior to final Paint. Only one thin coat of Paint was applied to preserve the various "character" marks that were originally provided by the Factory.

Notice the reference photos that were lying all around the vehicle while the Paint was being re-applied. It was a visual guide to ensure that Steve preserved and correctly restored the original paint patterns & features. It is extremely important to know the exact direction and angle that the Paint was originally applied. If not, you will end up with Paint contradictions that were never executed by the Factory. Study, Research and practice is the key here! One miniscule error within the process and it's back to the drawing board.

02.jpg

Underside during Primer phase

03.jpg

Primer build up back to correct original mil thickness

04.jpg

Primer build up back to correct original mil thickness

01.jpg

Color Sanding - Primer "spot" Buildup

02.jpg

Prep for Paint

03.jpg

Applying Color to Wheel Well Area

04.jpg

Applying Color to Under-hood & Engine Compartment
 

ECS

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
354
Reaction score
54
Here are a few shots that show the single (extremely thin) layer of enamel paint that Steve Been applied to the exterior of the Valiant. In the first photo, Tom Barcroft was taking the picture through a window in the paint booth. The next shot shows the car about a half hour after the black had been sprayed. The last one is after the paint was fully cured. This paint step was crucial because we could not wet sand the final finish. It had to go on perfectly to keep from going back and changing the original paint thickness that we had calculated throughout the wet sanding & spot primer steps. Steve practiced quite a bit before attempting this final paint stage.

01.jpg

Picture taken (through window) during Paint application

02.jpg

30 minutes after Paint was applied

03.jpg

Inspecting Paint after the final application
 

ECS

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
354
Reaction score
54
Here are additional photos after the paint had cured and assembly had been started. Notice the appearance of the paint in comparison to the previous photos that were taken while the paint was still wet. The luster stayed the same throughout the entire paint process. It was very important to end up with a finish that did not have to be wet sanded and buffed. FACTORY EXACT was the theme!

04.jpg

Valiant after the Paint had cured

01.jpg

Valiant Trunk Paint

02.jpg

Passenger side - low gloss Blackout treatment.

03.jpg

Driver side - low gloss Blackout treatment.
 

ECS

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
354
Reaction score
54
Below is a grouping of photos that illustrate the various layers of original materials used in the paint process on the Challenger. Also shown is a Chrysler animated Step by Step process of their dip procedures.

paint.jpg

Before & After Comparisons

spray-dipping.jpg

Chrysler Anti-Corrosion "Dip" Process
 

ECS

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
354
Reaction score
54
A frequent OE "mistake" is made when painting components such as Engine parts. The mistake occurs when all of the black pieces are painted at the same time. Since components like the brackets, heat shield, pulleys, etc...... were manufactured and painted by different Vendors, their sheen & appearance would NOT be identical. There were variations of "black" paint that would be evident throughout the Engine. Different components, different shades of black paint!

02.jpg

1970 Challenger - 440 4V Engine


01.jpg

Before - A/C Clutch


03.jpg

After - A/C Clutch
 

ECS

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
354
Reaction score
54
Here are a couple of pictures showing some "odd" characteristics that were found on the back side of the Package Tray. It showed evidence where other units had been stacked on top of each other when the color was applied. You can see the distinct "wet" patterns in the photos below.

01.JPG


02.JPG
 

ECS

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
354
Reaction score
54
Here are a few more detailed Before & After comparison photos.


01.jpg

Before


02.jpg

After


03.jpg

Before


04.jpg

After


05.jpg

Before


06.jpg

After


07.jpg

Original U Joints - Restored Unit & Un-restored Comparison
 

ECS

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
354
Reaction score
54
Even though the Valiant had low miles, a lot of the bare metal still had a significant coating of rust and pitting all over the surface. It took quite a bit of time and effort to make it look new again. Here are a few more comparison photos.

08.jpg

Before - Rusted Drive Shaft

07.JPG

Before - Rusted Drive Shaft

16.jpg

After - Original Drive Shaft Restored
 

ECS

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
354
Reaction score
54
I had a call earlier this week about the various identification numbers that are found on an Assembly line vehicle. Those aspects were also closely documented throughout this restoration project. Many of the Factory numbers could not be seen once the Valiant was re-assembled. Needless to say they were documented with the same scrutiny as the those that were in clear view. Here are just a few of the parts/photos (in no particular order) that had either the Chrysler Logo, part number or VIN impressions.

09.JPG


10.JPG


11.JPG


12.JPG


13.JPG


14.JPG


15.JPG


16.JPG


17.JPG


18.JPG


19.JPG


20.jpg
 

ECS

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
354
Reaction score
54
I've been asked many times about the lengths we have gone to "restore" these vehicles. The conversation usually ends up with opinions as to what "restore" actually means. I take the word for what it literally stands for. Many people think that making something look "fresh" is considered "Restored". About 99% of the Cars that are refinished are actually Modified, Altered or Customized. They no longer emulate the original aspects that they were built with. People don't like their vehicle being classified as Modified or Customized because it reminds them of a Car with Mag Wheels and a Blower sticking up out of the Hood. The fact is that if you change ANY aspect of how a Car came from the Factory, you have Modified, Altered or Customized it! The word "Restoration" is loosely and incorrectly used too many times when refurbishing an Automobile.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automotive_restoration
 

moparleo

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Messages
6,926
Reaction score
1,707
Location
So. Cal. Riverside area Moreno Valley
Of course very few "restorations" looks actually like factory finished. These cars were mass produced so there was no time or reason to carefully mask all areas or worry about paint thickness. Etc. Cars tend to be over restored or detailed better than they ever were when new. Paint dabs were done for QC purposes, ie. part was torqued/tightened to spec. Was proper part installed per the build sheet.etc...
 

ECS

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
354
Reaction score
54
Of course very few "restorations" looks actually like factory finished. These cars were mass produced so there was no time or reason to carefully mask all areas or worry about paint thickness. Etc. Cars tend to be over restored or detailed better than they ever were when new. Paint dabs were done for QC purposes, ie. part was torqued/tightened to spec. Was proper part installed per the build sheet.etc...

The process for which the Cars were massed produced is not a factor in the Restoration. A person who restores a car is trying to make the vehicle look original, regardless of the process it takes to accomplish that particular goal. Your comment about the thickness of the paint is a good example. The Factory paint was engineered to represent a specific mil thickness. That was how Chrysler Corporate was able to budget for the amount of paint materials that they would use throughout the year. Since the paint was applied by Assembly Line Workers (Human effort), the exact thickness varied from vehicle to vehicle. When "restoring" a Car back to its original parameters, you need to document the paint on the vehicle (if it is still original) or default to the engineering specifications if the original paint is no longer on the Car.

There is no such thing as an "over restored" Car! That phrase is an oxymoron. The word "restore" means to put something back to its original condition. If it is not brought back to its original condition it is Modified, Altered or Customized. The Hobby has adopted the concept of being "over restored" because they don't like their Cars being referred to as "customized" when they fall short of being able to duplicate a (correct) Factory appearance.
 
Last edited:

Ray

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2011
Messages
517
Reaction score
18
Location
K Pax
ECS

The process for which the Cars were massed produced is not a factor in the Restoration. A person who restores a car is trying to make the vehicle look original, regardless of the process it takes to accomplish that particular goal. Your comment about the thickness of the paint is a good example. The Factory paint was engineered to represent a specific mil thickness. That was how Chrysler Corporate was able to budget for the amount of paint materials that they would use
throughout the year. Since the paint was applied by
Assembly Line Workers (Human effort), the exact
thickness varied from vehicle to vehicle. When
"restoring" a Car back to its original parameters, you
need to document the paint on the vehicle (if it is still
original) or default to the engineering specifications if
the original paint is no longer on the Car.


----------------------------------------------------------

There is no such thing as an "over restored" Car! That phrase is an oxymoron. The word "restore" means to put something back to its original condition. If it is not brought back to its original condition it is Modified, Altered or Customized. The Hobby has adopted the concept of being "over restored" because they don't like their Cars being referred to as "customized" when they fall short of being able to duplicate a (correct) Factory appearance.

You can restore something to it's original appearance, but it is only original once.
Over restored would be something on the order of all body gaps being even, something these cars never were new. Customized, would Be to alter the appearance so as to make it unique or different then the rest.
 
Last edited:

ECS

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
354
Reaction score
54
Over restored would be something on the order of all body gaps being even, something these cars never were new. Customized, would Be to alter the appearance so as to make it unique or different then the rest.

You have changed the definition of the word "restore" to accommodate your agenda/perception. If the gaps in the body were not consistent and you alter their original status, you did not "restore" that particular feature. You modified, altered or customized that feature. (Even using your interpretation.) If you change the original status, you did not restore it! It is impossible to "over restore" anything. Putting those two words together is a contradiction of terms. That's like saying you can be a little bit pregnant. (lol)

Here is the definition of "restore".

re·store (r-stôr, -str)
tr.v. re·stored, re·stor·ing, re·stores
1. To bring back into existence or use; reestablish: restore law and order.
2. To bring back to an original condition: restore a building. See Synonyms at revive.
3. To put (someone) back in a former position: restore the emperor to the throne.
4. To make restitution of; give back: restore the stolen funds.
 
Back
Top